Lilītu
An Akkadian term found in the corpus of Mesopotamian texts. ORACC documents its written forms. But an attested word is not enough to prove the full biography of a figure who appears much later.
Source 01 · ORACC →One name, many contexts. Before we blend them together, let's look at which texts speak, and what story each one actually tells.
Introductory file · Updated October 5, 2026 · The episode video is coming to YouTube.
Artistic interpretation created with AI; it is not archaeological evidence.
Three similar names, three very different kinds of text. Each one needs its own reading.
An Akkadian term found in the corpus of Mesopotamian texts. ORACC documents its written forms. But an attested word is not enough to prove the full biography of a figure who appears much later.
Source 01 · ORACC →In Isaiah 34:14, the Hebrew word appears in a passage about the desolation of Edom. The JPS translation on Sefaria treats it as a kind of demon. The passage tells no story of a marriage to Adam.
Source 02 · Isaiah 34:14 →This story develops in the Alphabet of Ben Sira, a medieval text. It is a literary tradition, not a verified historical biography.
Source 04 · Study of the tradition →Follow the name across the ages, source by source.
This order is a guide for reading the sources. It does not prove a direct, unbroken transmission from one stage to the next.
Look at the attestations of lilītu in the Akkadian corpus. For a precise date, each tablet and its edition must be examined.
Consult the corpus →A precise literary context: a desolate landscape. Compare the translations and read the passage surrounding the verse.
Read the passage →The Talmud mentions Lilith in a warning about sleeping alone in a house. We study this as a belief recorded in the text.
Find the Talmudic reference →This text presents Lilith as Adam's companion who demands equality. A new narrative builds on older traditions.
Explore studies of the narrative →We can't conclude that just because the names are similar. Each attestation requires analysis of language, period and context. This file places the sources side by side without presenting a direct line as a certainty.
No. Isaiah 34:14 places the word in a desolate landscape; the story of Adam's wife comes from a later narrative. See Source 02 and Source 04.
The identification of this relief is still debated: Ishtar, Ereshkigal and Lilītu are among the scholars' proposals. The British Museum text republished on Khan Academy presents several possibilities. We do not use it as a certain identification of Lilith. See Source 05.
Ancient sources show what the text says; studies and museum notes help us understand context and debates.
See the entry for lilītu and its written forms in the corpus of anti-witchcraft texts.
Open the ORACC glossary ↗Hebrew text and translations; read the whole chapter to keep the context of Edom.
Read Isaiah 34:14 ↗A rabbinic attestation of Lilith; read the passage on Sefaria.
Read Shabbat 151b ↗Reference article on the rabbinic and medieval traditions, with a bibliography. Useful for the context of the Alphabet of Ben Sira.
Read the reference article ↗British Museum text republished on Khan Academy: the object and the different proposals for identifying its figure.
Read about the object ↗Send them this file so they can follow the references too. And subscribe on YouTube so you don't miss the episode.